​I know I have posted some of this before, but I can't remember when. I ran across my study notes today and see it in new light!
D&C 45 is one of my favorites because the Savior says he will show unto the spirits in heaven how the events will come about!

16 And I will show it plainly as I showed it unto my disciples as I stood before them in the flesh, and spake unto them, saying: As ye have asked of me concerning the signs of my coming, in the day when I shall come in my glory in the clouds of heaven, to fulfil the promises that I have made unto your fathers,



Here's the order of events!

32 - Desolating Sickness (Ebola)

33 - EQ's around the world and war everywhere.

36 - Light breaks forth, Jews accept the gospel, wonders will happen as signs.

42 - The sun hides its face (Eclipse?)

43 - Remnant will go to the place (New Jerusalem)

45 - The resurrection (morning of the first) will happen, THEN HIS ARM WILL FALL (Destruction of the wicked.)

48 - Goes to Jerusalem (Mt. of Olives)

49 - Destroys the wicked and stops Armageddon, the Jews look upon him

55 - Satan is bound.

56 - 10 Virgins parable fulfilled. Wedding feast!

66-75 Continued gathering of others to gather to Zion.

Sarah Menet will be the guest on the Kate Dalley Show tomorrow (Friday 6/16/2022) on KZNU, Saint George, Utah - 1450 AM and 931. FM
(I'm still looking for the time.) 
To listen -

Here is the archived interview:  
​https://soundcloud.com/katedalleyradio/061722-sarah-menet-nde-what-happens-to-america-wow

​Michael Sussmann has been acquitted

The acquittal is no surprise. This is a DC jury, after all. In the Roger Stone case, for example, we documented how a juror lied to get on the panel. (That judge didn’t care.) Making matters worse, the Sussmann judge wrongly allowed for a woman to remain on the jury, despite the fact that her daughter and Sussmann’s are on the same high school crew team. One can’t help but think that juror had her own daughter’s interests in mind – the cohesion of the crew team – when she reached a decision.
On the facts, there was more than sufficient evidence to prove Sussmann’s guilt. Sussmann lied to then-FBI general counsel James Baker in order to get a meeting to pass the Alfa Bank hoax materials to the FBI. Sussmann lied again during the meeting – stating he was not there on behalf of a client – in order to get the FBI to open an investigation into the Trump Organization’s purported ties with Alfa Bank. Later, during testimony to Congress, Sussmann admitted he met with Baker on behalf of a client. Billing records proved he had been working on the Alfa Bank project on behalf of the Clinton Campaign.
The acquittal is no surprise. This is a DC jury, after all. In the Roger Stone case, for example, we documented how a juror lied to get on the panel. (That judge didn’t care.) Making matters worse, the Sussmann judge wrongly allowed for a woman to remain on the jury, despite the fact that her daughter and Sussmann’s are on the same high school crew team. One can’t help but think that juror had her own daughter’s interests in mind – the cohesion of the crew team, sparing her of teenage drama, etc. – when she reached a decision.
After the verdict was announced, the jury’s forewoman held court before the media and expressed her displeasure that the Special Counsel prosecute a false statement case: “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”
This juror was never impartial - despite her assurance to the judge.
On the facts, the evidence was more than sufficient to prove Sussmann’s guilt. Sussmann lied to then-FBI general counsel James Baker via text message in order to get a meeting to pass the Alfa Bank hoax materials to the FBI.
DOJ released exhibits showing Sussmann's texts to FBI Baker­­­
Sussmann lied again during the meeting – stating he was not there on behalf of a client – in order to get the FBI to open an investigation into the Trump Organization’s purported ties with Alfa Bank.
Later, during testimony to Congress, Sussmann admitted he met with Baker on behalf of a client.
Billing records proved he had been working on the Alfa Bank project on behalf of the Clinton Campaign.  Evidence also demonstrated that Sussmann billed the Clinton Campaign for the thumb drives passed to Baker during the meeting. How was the Clinton Campaign billed? 

­­Sussmann referenced the “confidential project” - the Alfa Bank project.
I won’t say the verdict doesn’t matter. Of course it matters. It would have proven that a DC jury can convict one of their own. It would have resulted in accountability for lying to the FBI. Not the gravest of crimes, but it is still a crime.